Matthew 1:2-6

Matthew 1:2-6

[2] Abraham  begat  Isaac;  and  Isaac  begat  Jacob;  and  Jacob  begat  Judas  and  his  brethren;  [3] And  Judas  begat  Phares  and  Zara  of  Thamar;  and  Phares  begat  Esrom;  and  Esrom  begat  Aram;  [4] And  Aram  begat  Aminadab;  and  Aminadab  begat  Naasson;  and  Naasson  begat  Salmon;  [5] And  Salmon  begat  Booz  of  Rachab;  and  Booz  begat  Obed  of  Ruth;  and  Obed  begat  Jesse;  [6] And  Jesse  begat  David  the king;  and  David  the king  begat  Solomon  of  her  that had been the wife of Urias; 

What does Matthew 1:2-6 Mean?

Contextual Meaning

In tracing Jesus" genealogy, why did Matthew begin with Abraham rather than with Adam, as Luke did? Matthew wanted to show Jesus" Jewish heritage, and to do this he only needed to go back as far as Abraham, the father of the Jewish race. Significantly, Matthew called him Abraham rather than Abram. The longer name connotes the covenant privileges that God made to Abraham when He changed his name.
The writer separated Judah and his brothers ( Matthew 1:2) because the messianic promise of rulership went to Judah alone ( Genesis 49:10). This allusion to the12tribes of Israel provides another clue that Matthew"s interests were strongly royal (cf. Matthew 8:11; Matthew 19:28).
Matthew also mentioned Perez"s brother ( Matthew 1:3) perhaps because he was his twin. But he probably did so because Perez was a key figure in both the Old Testament genealogies ( Ruth 4; 1 Chronicles 4) and in Jewish tradition.
"Jewish tradition traced the royal line to Perez (Ruth iv12 , 18ff.), and "son of Perez" is a Rabb[1]. expression for the Messiah." [2]
The inclusion of Tamar ( Matthew 1:3), Rahab (v5), and Ruth ( Matthew 1:5) as well as Bathsheba ( Matthew 1:6 b) is unusual because the Jews traced their heritage through their male ancestors (until the Middle Ages). Matthew"s mention of each of these women reveals his emphases.
"Of the four mentioned two-Rahab and Ruth -are foreigners, and three-Tamar, Rahab and Bathsheba-were stained with sin." [3]
"Of these four, two (Tamar and Rahab) were Canaanites, one (Ruth) a Moabite, and one (Bathsheba) presumably a Hittite. Surely they exemplify the principle of the sovereign grace of God, who not only is able to use the foreign (and perhaps even the disreputable) to accomplish his eternal purposes, but even seems to delight in doing so." [4]
The writer had several purposes for including these women. First, he showed that Jesus came to include sinners in the family of God by seeking and saving the lost (cf. Matthew 1:21). [5] Second, their inclusion shows the universal character of Jesus" ministry and kingdom. [6] After the Jews rejected Jesus as their Messiah, God opened the doors of the church to Gentiles equally with Jews. Matthew"s Gospel records the beginning of this change. Third, reference to these women prepares the reader for the significant role Mary will play in the messianic line though, of course, she was neither a great sinner nor a foreigner. [7] All five women became partakers in the messianic line through strange and unexpected divine providence. Matthew may have mentioned these women to disarm criticism by showing that God countenanced irregular marital unions in Messiah"s legal ancestry. [8]
"The word "King" with "David" [9] would evoke profound nostalgia and arouse eschatological hope in first-century Jews. Matthew thus makes the royal theme explicit: King Messiah has appeared. David"s royal authority, lost at the Exile, has now been regained and surpassed by "great David"s greater son" ..." [10]
"The addition of the title, the king, marks the end of this period of waiting, and points forward to Jesus, the Son of David, the Christ, the King of the Jews." [11]
A fourth reason was apparently to highlight four Old Testament stories that illustrate a common point. That point is that in each case a Gentile showed extraordinary faith in contrast to Jews, who were greatly lacking in their faith. [12]
"The allusions to these stories accomplish four theological purposes.
"First, they demonstrate God"s providential hand in preserving Messiah"s line, even in apostate times. This naturally led to Matthew"s account of the virgin conception, through which God brought the Messiah into the world.
"Second, they demonstrate God"s heart for godly Gentiles and the significant role of their faith at crucial times in Israel"s history.
"Third, they demonstrate the importance of the Abrahamic and Davidic covenants in understanding Messiah"s mission, with a focus on faith and obedience, not a racial line.
"Fourth, they call Matthew"s readers to repentance and humility, and to accepting Gentiles into the body of Christ, thereby affirming an important theme of Matthew"s Gospel." [10]5